<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Searching for that elusive fact!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://grumbledook.com/2009/06/28/searching-for-that-elusive-fact/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://grumbledook.com/2009/06/28/searching-for-that-elusive-fact/</link>
	<description>Another Blog from Grumbledook &#38; co</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 10:26:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://grumbledook.com/2009/06/28/searching-for-that-elusive-fact/comment-page-1/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 08:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grumbledook.com/2009/06/28/searching-for-that-elusive-fact/#comment-147</guid>
		<description>How about trying BlindSearch for a week, and see what it tells you about the search engines.
http://blindsearch.fejus.com/

It presents the results from Google, Bing and Yahoo all on one page - anonymised, so I then find myself reverse engineering it in my head (and normally, being wrong!)

Ray</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about trying BlindSearch for a week, and see what it tells you about the search engines.<br />
<a href="http://blindsearch.fejus.com/" rel="nofollow" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/blindsearch.fejus.com/?referer=');">http://blindsearch.fejus.com/</a></p>
<p>It presents the results from Google, Bing and Yahoo all on one page &#8211; anonymised, so I then find myself reverse engineering it in my head (and normally, being wrong!)</p>
<p>Ray</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AngryTechnician</title>
		<link>http://grumbledook.com/2009/06/28/searching-for-that-elusive-fact/comment-page-1/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>AngryTechnician</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 07:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grumbledook.com/2009/06/28/searching-for-that-elusive-fact/#comment-146</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve actually been using &#039;other than Google&#039; for my searching for about 6 months now, primarily using Bing (and it&#039;s previous incarnation Live Search). I&#039;m particularly fond of Bing Maps for it&#039;s &#039;Bird Eye&#039; view, which I find much clearer than a top-down satellite view, and easier to navigate than Google&#039;s Street view.

My suggestions for additional options run very much along the lines of your original thinking - I use BBC News and Times Online for news, often use Flickr for images (particularly useful as the Advanced search allows you to specify only Creative Commons licensed images). I also have Wikipedia in my search bar and find myself heading to that as a starting point for information on a topic, though obviously that relies on the topic I&#039;m looking for being well-referenced.

Overall, I don&#039;t really miss Google. When I first made the switch I found Live Search was actually producing more relevant results, though YMMV. The only thing I find myself heading there for sometimes is the image search, as Bing&#039;s image search doesn&#039;t have an &#039;extra large&#039; image search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve actually been using &#8216;other than Google&#8217; for my searching for about 6 months now, primarily using Bing (and it&#8217;s previous incarnation Live Search). I&#8217;m particularly fond of Bing Maps for it&#8217;s &#8216;Bird Eye&#8217; view, which I find much clearer than a top-down satellite view, and easier to navigate than Google&#8217;s Street view.</p>
<p>My suggestions for additional options run very much along the lines of your original thinking &#8211; I use BBC News and Times Online for news, often use Flickr for images (particularly useful as the Advanced search allows you to specify only Creative Commons licensed images). I also have Wikipedia in my search bar and find myself heading to that as a starting point for information on a topic, though obviously that relies on the topic I&#8217;m looking for being well-referenced.</p>
<p>Overall, I don&#8217;t really miss Google. When I first made the switch I found Live Search was actually producing more relevant results, though YMMV. The only thing I find myself heading there for sometimes is the image search, as Bing&#8217;s image search doesn&#8217;t have an &#8216;extra large&#8217; image search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Evans</title>
		<link>http://grumbledook.com/2009/06/28/searching-for-that-elusive-fact/comment-page-1/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 01:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grumbledook.com/2009/06/28/searching-for-that-elusive-fact/#comment-145</guid>
		<description>The power of Google is incredible and my immediate choice for searching the web.  However, just as BBC is my immediate choice for news, my immediate choice for ICT related queries is Twitter. It works like an informed search engines, bringing forward not a list of names, but a list of opinions, which, thus far has been invaluable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The power of Google is incredible and my immediate choice for searching the web.  However, just as BBC is my immediate choice for news, my immediate choice for ICT related queries is Twitter. It works like an informed search engines, bringing forward not a list of names, but a list of opinions, which, thus far has been invaluable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
